What's to Be and What's Not to Be Considered As Music?

In my view, not every structure out of musical show appears to be can be regarded as Songs. In purchase to be music, the structure in query must be tonal, melodic, and to be music of traditional design - satisfying and serious moreover to the above. Music appropriate can't happen without tune. It's not enough to show feelings in appears to be. With notices (and musical show sounds) one should play and dancing. Well, or narrate. One should not, for example, sketch or colour with them - the right factors you can do that with are colour licks or pens. When a musician attracts with appears to be, he does not cope with and create music appropriate. Unfortunately, beginning with the Twentieth millennium, quite a lot of writers hit out on this incorrect way. Opponent: I can't accept to limiting music in any way! Everyone has his own, personal perspective. Those, who see creation, images, they "draw" or "paint". For example, Rachmaninov had written his Etudes-tableaux, showing quite tangible images. Isn't it Music?! Others cannot see so, but can play and dancing or existing music in yet other methods. All relies on a person's own personal, inner perspective of music. So what one individual recognizes as a visible image, an image, others can existing as tune (a dancing, a song). Music is worldwide as a whole and personal in its areas. Reply to the opponent: Oh, yes. Different individuals can have different thoughts and views and see music in their own personal methods. A lot relies on a person's own inner, personal sensation and knowing. But the actual, purpose, right and actual condition of factors does not rely on it and won't modify. We also know - Man is vulnerable to mistake. People significantly vary in how quickly they get deceived and how total and regular errors they create are. Different innovative areas are part of and are controlled by different Muses, not by one, worldwide, as you had written. Each Muse has her own methods and resources. If a musician for some purpose (he can't, he won't, hasn't got taste) prevents melodic perform and with musical show appears to be begins to do what is to be done with shows, colour licks and pens or follows another incorrect course - say, that of 'theatre of sounds', then it indicates he rests down between two seats (which take a position apart from one another). Try to sit between 2 chairs! - Where shall you discover yourself? Anyway, not in the area of Songs. Nor do you handle to get to the area of Visual Artistry. You just drop onto the ground. Not few writers discovered themselves where they did not plan to be. Thus, personality and personal look for are welcome until one has the right evaluate in him and the sensation of it. As far as the Rachmaninov's Etudes-tableaux are involved - you drop short to study properly what I've had written. Rachmaninov is a well known melodist and these etudes are really musical show arrangements. There is quite a lot of melodic material in them, diversions are limited. The very name "... -tableaux" deceived you. Yet another believed to the point: Music should always bring Elegance, even when it informs us about something very sad and terrible. In this regard music is much like belles-lettres, stories, contrary to non-fictional, documented explain. Some writers missing the right direction and sensation and had written stories.